top of page

Woke is the New Red

Aug 25, 2023
3 min read

Updated: Jan 31, 2024

by Frances Moore Lappé, Aug 20, 2023


In the 1950s “communist” was the slur of choice to attack those focused on equity, particularly for people of color.


(Photo Credit: Danny Burke/Unsplash)


Originally Published on Common Dreams, Aug 20, 2023


Over half of Republicans agree that “fighting woke ideology in our schools and businesses” is more important than protecting Social Security and Medicare, finds a recent Wall Street Journal survey.

“Florida is where woke comes to die,” brags the state’s governor Ron DeSantis, “woke” is “basically a war on the truth.” Under the banner of anti-woke, he enacted sweeping limitations on what can be taught in public schools, a six-week abortion ban, and America’s cruelest anti-trans policies.


For DeSantis, the “woke” are “cultural Marxists” who are to blame for what’s broken in America.


We’ve endured a long history of labels that mislead, divide, and hinder us. So, let’s stop the name calling, listen to the actual agenda of those with whom we think we differ, and engage in real conversation.


Merriam-Webster defines “woke” first as being “aware of and actively attentive to important societal facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice).” The term took off in 2014 after Michael Brown was shot in Ferguson, Missouri, and then came to be used in the Black Lives Matter movement.

Today, “woke” is a sweeping, ill-defined insult making it harder to find common ground essential to reforms benefiting most Americans, such as lifting the minimum wage.


For those who lived through the 1950s it rings painful bells. Back then, “communist” was the slur of choice to attack those focused on equity, particularly for people of color. The McCarthy-era witch hunt caused as many as 12,000 people to lose their jobs.


Growing up in Fort Worth, Texas, in the early ’50s my parents helped found the first Unitarian church and to integrate it. The FBI took notice. I’ll never forget an agent knocking on our door as part of the agency’s investigation of our church. The inquiry was scary enough to shrink our membership. It didn’t shut us down but did lead to several members being fired from their jobs.


As a kid, I thought that we were suspect in the eyes of the FBI because Unitarians were seen as atheists, and atheism was associated with communism. Only recently did I learn my storyline was wrong.


With access to church archives, I discovered a letter from someone in our congregation to J. Edgar Hoover complaining that a member of our church had been questioned by two FBI agents at his home. The letter stated that “Among other questions, this man was asked what he thought of racial equality for Negroes, would he marry a Negro, and whether or not he attended the Unitarian Church.” He added: “I think you will agree these questions are completely out of line.”


Hoover’s response? “No questions were asked by representatives of this Bureau such as are alleged in your letter.”


At about the same time I uncovered these documents, someone in my extended family shared with me his related experience with the FBI. During the Korean War, the army had called him to serve. But when the recruiter learned he was a member of the NAACP, my relative was told that he was no longer qualified because that affiliation meant he was likely a communist.


Today, “woke” as a put down is similarly worrying. The term is derived from African American Vernacular English, meaning to be “alert to racial prejudice and discrimination.” It could have become a rallying cry for a better America. Especially now, as the Supreme Court has rejected affirmative action, facing racism’s deep and painful harm becomes even more urgent.


We’ve endured a long history of labels that mislead, divide, and hinder us. So, let’s stop the name calling, listen to the actual agenda of those with whom we think we differ, and engage in real conversation. We might discover common ground on which we can all advance.


We would then be able to tackle the long-standing, anti-democratic economic and political rules that generate income inequality more extreme than in 109 countries—including all of the Western, industrial world—and wealth so tightly held that the top 1% control almost as much as the bottom 90%. Such unequal economic power harms us all, as it is linked to poorer health and education, greater violence, and other social ills. Its effects also infuse our political lives, twisting policies to further favor the few and undermining democracy itself.


Together we could in fact wake up to what truly harms us and thus become eager to join hands for the benefit of all.

2,083 Comments


COMMENT CHUYEN NGHIEP
COMMENT CHUYEN NGHIEP
3 hours ago

PK68 game có đáng để mình ghé thử không? Mình cũng hơi nghi ngại như mọi lần thôi, vì mấy trang kiểu này đôi khi nhìn vào là thấy rối ngay, nên mình vào chủ yếu để kiểm tra bố cục có dễ hiểu không. Lướt qua một chút thì giao diện lại khá thoáng, chữ to vừa đủ và các mục được tách thành từng khối rõ ràng nên kéo trên điện thoại cũng đỡ mệt (mình dùng 4G nên càng quan tâm).

Like

Sohanur Rohoman
4 hours ago

Mình có lần mở SUNWIN và dành vài phút để xem cách các chuyên mục được phân bổ trên giao diện. Phần menu tương đối dễ tìm và thứ tự các mục cũng khá rõ khi nhìn tổng thể. Các nhóm nội dung được tách riêng nên mình không cảm thấy phải kiểm tra quá nhiều phần trước khi tìm đúng khu vực. Mình thử quay lại trang trước sau vài lần chuyển mục và thấy bố cục vẫn nhất quán. Cách tổ chức như vậy giúp thao tác dễ nhớ hơn.

Like

Sohanur Rohoman
4 hours ago

B52CLUB là một trong những cái tên mình xem qua khi muốn quan sát cách website tổ chức nhiều nhóm nội dung. Mình để ý rằng các chuyên mục được tách khá rõ và menu giúp xác định nhanh những khu vực chính. Thay vì phải mở nhiều trang, mình có thể dựa vào tên từng mục để lựa chọn nơi muốn xem trước. Khi thử chuyển qua lại, cấu trúc giao diện vẫn giữ được sự ổn định. Tổng thể khá thuận tiện cho việc định hướng.

Like

Sohanur Rohoman
4 hours ago

Lúc ghé HITCLUB mình thử bắt đầu từ menu rồi lần lượt chuyển qua một số chuyên mục để xem cách nội dung được sắp xếp. Từng phần có vị trí tương đối rõ và thứ tự hiển thị không khiến mình phải tìm kiếm quá lâu. Sau đó mình quay lại những khu vực trước để kiểm tra sự nhất quán của giao diện. Bố cục nhìn chung vẫn giữ cùng một cách tổ chức. Nhờ vậy việc di chuyển qua lại giữa các mục khá dễ theo dõi.

Like

Sohanur Rohoman
4 hours ago

Mình biết tới SUNWIN khi đang quan sát cách các trang sắp xếp nhiều chuyên mục mà vẫn giữ giao diện dễ theo dõi. Ở lần xem đầu tiên, mình tập trung vào tên từng mục và vị trí của menu để hiểu cấu trúc chung. Các khu vực được phân chia khá rõ nên việc xác định nơi cần vào không mất nhiều thời gian. Khi chuyển giữa một số phần, cách bố trí vẫn tương đối đồng nhất. Với mình đây là yếu tố giúp giao diện dễ làm quen hơn.

Like
FEATURED POSTS
RECENT POSTS
bottom of page